ArticleCancer innovation2026
Treatment Outcomes With Novel Targeted and Immunotherapeutic Regimens in CAYA Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Cancer innovation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Treatment Outcomes With Novel Targeted and Immunotherapeutic Regimens in CAYA Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Retrospective Study.Cancer innovation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of novel chemotherapy regimens, including brentuximab vedotin (BV) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), in children, adolescents, and young adults (CAYA) with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on untreated Stage IIB (bulky), III, or IV HL patients (≤ 24 years) who were admitted to Cancer Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, from 2017 to 2024. The cohort compared conventional regimens with BV‑based therapies (BV‑AVD ± R). Furthermore, the efficacy and safety of ICIs were evaluated in relapsed/refractory cHL patients receiving second‑line or later therapy. Results: In this comparison between BV and conventional regimens, 182 patients were enrolled. The median follow-up was 38 months. No significant differences were observed in objective response rate (ORR) (96.4% Conclusion: For patients with stage II Hodgkin lymphoma presenting with bulky disease, as well as those with stage III-IV disease, the BV-AVD regimen is recommended as first-line therapy, given its more favorable toxicity profile.Although ICIs represent a promising therapeutic approach, existing studies are constrained by limited sample sizes. Future research should focus on expanding patient cohorts to refine treatment strategies and ultimately improve clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.