ArticleOpen research Europe2025
Serious game in developing emotional competence: An evaluation report.
Article in Open research Europe, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The importance of the development of emotional competence amongst health care professionals is widely emphasised in the literature. The use of serious games in this regard is to-date in its infancy. Methods: This paper reports a evaluation exercise which was carried out to evaluate the development and application of a Serious Game as an educational resource amongst nursing students. The educational purpose of the game was to enable and support the development of emotional competence amongst nursing students. Undergraduate nursing students were invited to play the game and to participate in two focus group discussions which sought to evaluate the game as an educational tool. Eight nursing students participated in the evaluation exercise. Students' experience and feedback were collected via two audio-recorded, transcribed focus group discussions lasting about an hour, with participant consent. Guided by Braun and Clarke's guiding steps for data analysis, entailed the thematic analysis of the transcribed focus group discussions was carried out by the authors. Results: Three themes were derived from the data analysis; Perceived motivation for participation, Positive aspects of the workshop using Serious Game, and Future Initiatives. Conclusions: The use of serious games as an educational tool for developing emotional competence holds potential which merits further study and investigation. Targeting educators and game designers, the findings of the evaluation exercise are discussed and recommendations for future similar initiatives are shared in view of contributing to the development of similar educational initiatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.