ReviewJAMIA open2026
Digital vaccines for immunization equity: an approach to strengthen vaccine delivery and public trust in low- and middle-income countries.
Review in JAMIA open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Global immunization efforts still face major inequities and declining vaccine confidence, leaving millions of children in low- and middle-income countries unvaccinated or under-vaccinated. Objectives: This article aims to discuss "digital vaccines," including SMS reminders, mobile apps, electronic immunization registries, gamification, and virtual reality education, as practical complements to routine immunization services. Results: Using an organizing framework focused on access, equity, and trust, we highlight how digital tools can reduce missed appointments, strengthen follow-up for zero-dose children, improve data quality for planning, and support transparent and culturally responsive communication to counter misinformation. We also outline the barriers that limit equitable impact, including digital divides, gender gaps in phone access, fragmented information systems, limited financing, and concerns about data governance. Many children in poorer countries still do not get the vaccines they need. Some families live too far from clinics. Others do not trust vaccines or the health system. This article looks at how digital tools can help more children get vaccinated. These tools include text message reminders, phone apps, online health records, digital games, and virtual reality lessons. Text reminders help parents remember vaccine dates. Online records help health workers find children who missed their vaccines. Digital games teach people why vaccines are safe. These tools can also help planners know how many vaccines are needed and where to send them. They can share clear, respectful health messages and fight false claims about vaccines. But not everyone can use these tools. Some people do not have smartphones or internet access. Women, who often care for children, may not have their own phones. There are also worries about keeping personal data safe and paying for these systems. Conclusions: We propose implementation principles that emphasize inclusive design, interoperability, privacy safeguards, and hybrid online and offline delivery models. We suggest that digital tools should be easy to use for all, keep private data safe, and work well with other health systems. Where there is no internet, non-digital options should also be offered. With the right support, these tools can help make sure all children get their vaccines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.