Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41978675›Full record

ArticleOpen access journal of contraception2026

A Tale as Old as Time: Contraception Concerns in the 21st Century.

Rachel Margaret Bottomley-Wise, Amie Woodward, Adenike Okanlawon, Amanda J Mason-Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open access journal of contraception, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rachel Margaret Bottomley-WiseDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6972-0100
Amie WoodwardInstitute for Health and Care Improvement, York St John University, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9579-4012
Adenike OkanlawonDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0009-0002-5839-3292
Amanda J Mason-JonesDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4292-3183

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Historical inconsistencies in contraception research have led to concerns about side effects regarding hormonal contraception. Today, concerns about the hormonal contraceptive pill are still ongoing. The side effects from hormonal contraception and prevailing socioeconomic barriers to effective contraception have heralded in the use of Mobile Health (mHealth) applications as birth control methods. These applications are set to become ubiquitous with the proliferation of wearable devices that monitor biodata. Access to modern contraceptives depends on who you are and where you live and often has cost-implications. The use of "mHealth" applications has been rising in recent years and are marketed as having maximal reward for minimal cost and perhaps could alleviate some of these concerns. While mHealth applications are flexible, accessible, and low cost, this paper suggests that we exercise caution so as not to repeat past mistakes. We provide a critical review of the history of research into contraception. We may have come far, but we still have a long way to go for equitable access to contraceptive healthcare.

Indexed as

contraceptionethicsmHealthreproductive justicewearable device

Identifiers

PMID41978675
PMCPMC13070127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.