Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41978637›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Investigating the barriers to uptake and utilization of overdose response hotlines and apps: A study based on data from a national survey.

Boogyung Seo, Nathan Rider, Dylan Viste, William Rioux, Avnit Dhanoa, Maria Vasquez, Bo Pan, Sumantra Monty Ghosh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Boogyung SeoDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0016-2355
Nathan RiderDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2424-6005
Dylan VisteDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5340-2682
William RiouxDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4278-9751
Avnit DhanoaDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Maria VasquezDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Bo PanDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Sumantra Monty GhoshDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1566-0015

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Overdose Response Hotlines and Apps (ORHAs) are novel technologies designed to avert fatal overdose associated with solitary use of illicit substances. While they can be a useful tool for those who cannot reach in-person harm reduction support, previous literature has cited potential barriers to their access. The aim of this study was to quantitatively evaluate the types of barriers that may hinder the uptake and utilization of ORHAs from the perspective of key stakeholders. Methods: The current study reports on the data obtained from Canadian National Questionnaire on Overdose Monitoring (CNQOM) focusing on people who currently use substances (PWUS-C), have used substances in the past (PWUS-P), and addiction service providers (ASP). A combination of purposive and representative sampling was used for recruitment. A list of potential partner organizations across Canada was contacted between July 2022 and May 2023. We explored logistical, technological, and social barriers to assess the acceptability of ORHAs. Results: A total of 971 participants were included in this study, consisting of 268 PWUS-C, 525 PWUS-P, and 178 ASP. Barriers to ORHA were categorized into: service delivery and quality barriers, technological barriers, and stigma/social barriers. More than half of the respondents across all groups rated the barriers as 4 (significant) or higher on the Likert scale. Ordinal logistic regression revealed that being an ASP was associated with higher likelihood of rating certain barriers as more significant compared to PWUS-C and PWUS-P. Conclusion: This study is the first to quantify concerns about potential barriers to the use of ORHAs from the perspectives of key Canadian interest groups and provide valuable information on how to improve accessibility and utility of overdose prevention technologies to a wider range of demographics.

Indexed as

harm reductionhotlinesmobile appsoverdose responsesubstance use

Identifiers

PMID41978637
PMCPMC13070188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.