ReviewCureus2026
Tourniquet Use and Anesthesiology Considerations in Patients With Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome: Balancing Orthopedic Needs With Anesthetic Safety.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (hEDS) is a hereditary connective tissue disorder characterized by generalized joint hypermobility, soft tissue fragility, chronic pain, and autonomic dysfunction. Although major vascular complications are uncommon in hEDS, affected individuals frequently undergo orthopedic procedures, including ligament reconstructions, tendon repair, and joint stabilization, due to recurrent dislocations and musculoskeletal injury. Consequently, careful evaluation of pneumatic tourniquet use in this patient population is warranted. Pneumatic tourniquets are widely used in extremity orthopedic surgery to reduce blood loss and improve visualization. However, their effects on peripheral nerve integrity, pain outcomes, and soft tissue injury in patients with hEDS remain poorly understood. These concerns are particularly relevant in the context of regional anesthesia, where chronic pain syndromes and autonomic dysfunction may complicate perioperative analgesia and postoperative neurologic assessments. This narrative review examines the pathophysiology of hEDS and explores anesthetic and orthopedic considerations related to tourniquet use in this patient population. While tourniquets offer clear intraoperative advantages, patients with hEDS may be at increased risk for skin injury, compression neuropraxia, exaggerated ischemia-reperfusion pain, and delayed postoperative recovery. In the absence of evidence-based guidelines, tourniquet use in patients with hEDS should involve shared decision-making among anesthesiologists, surgeons, and patients. Individualized discussions addressing potential risks, alternative techniques, and modifiable tourniquet parameters, such as pressure levels, duration, and padding placement, may help mitigate perioperative complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.