Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41978589›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Diagnosis and Management of Synchronous Prostate and Rectal Cancer in a Patient.

Hamail Iqbal, Nilanjan Haldar, Adam C Mueller

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hamail IqbalDepartment of Medicine, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, USA.
Nilanjan HaldarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA.
Adam C MuellerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The management of the synchronous occurrence of prostate and rectal cancer presents a challenge due to their anatomic proximity. Considering the high morbidity and mortality of malignancies individually, well-targeted treatment planning is required for optimal survival outcomes; however, management strategies have not been standardized. We describe the diagnosis and treatment of synchronous prostate and rectal cancer in a single patient. An Epic chart review of a 70-year-old man with synchronous prostate and rectal cancer was completed. The patient presented with urinary frequency, weak urinary stream, and nocturia. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and transrectal biopsy confirmed intermediate-risk, stage IIC prostate adenocarcinoma. Concurrently, findings suspicious for malignancy were identified on screening colonoscopy. MRI and pathology confirmed stage IIIB colonic adenocarcinoma. Initial treatment for the prostate cancer was begun with leuprolide and bicalutamide. Subsequently, the patient was prescribed volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to the rectum, prostate, and lymph nodes; followed by the rectum and prostate; and finally the prostate. The patient received concurrent capecitabine. When treating synchronous malignancies, an integrated approach is necessary to minimize the length of intervention and adverse events. Compared to the serial treatment of rectal and prostate cancer, concurrent treatment with the expansion of the target volume has demonstrated decreased risk of wound complications and comparable disease-free survival. Further long-term follow-up and monitoring are needed to establish standard management strategies for synchronous prostate and rectal cancer.

Indexed as

chemoradiationfield cancerizationprostate cancerradiation therapyrectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID41978589
PMCPMC13070481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.