ArticleCureus2026
Diagnosis and Management of Synchronous Prostate and Rectal Cancer in a Patient.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The management of the synchronous occurrence of prostate and rectal cancer presents a challenge due to their anatomic proximity. Considering the high morbidity and mortality of malignancies individually, well-targeted treatment planning is required for optimal survival outcomes; however, management strategies have not been standardized. We describe the diagnosis and treatment of synchronous prostate and rectal cancer in a single patient. An Epic chart review of a 70-year-old man with synchronous prostate and rectal cancer was completed. The patient presented with urinary frequency, weak urinary stream, and nocturia. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and transrectal biopsy confirmed intermediate-risk, stage IIC prostate adenocarcinoma. Concurrently, findings suspicious for malignancy were identified on screening colonoscopy. MRI and pathology confirmed stage IIIB colonic adenocarcinoma. Initial treatment for the prostate cancer was begun with leuprolide and bicalutamide. Subsequently, the patient was prescribed volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to the rectum, prostate, and lymph nodes; followed by the rectum and prostate; and finally the prostate. The patient received concurrent capecitabine. When treating synchronous malignancies, an integrated approach is necessary to minimize the length of intervention and adverse events. Compared to the serial treatment of rectal and prostate cancer, concurrent treatment with the expansion of the target volume has demonstrated decreased risk of wound complications and comparable disease-free survival. Further long-term follow-up and monitoring are needed to establish standard management strategies for synchronous prostate and rectal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.