Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41978587›Full record

ReviewJournal of pain research2026

A Comprehensive Evidence-Based Review of Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions for Neonatal Pain.

Yongxue Cai, Shanghui Sun, Chunli Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yongxue CaiDepartment of Neonatology, The Second People's Hospital of Hefei, Hefei, Anhui, 230011, People's Republic of China.
Shanghui SunDepartment of Nursing, The Second People's Hospital of Hefei, Hefei, Anhui, 230011, People's Republic of China.
Chunli ChenDepartment of Nursing, The Second People's Hospital of Hefei, Hefei, Anhui, 230011, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0008-2563-7864

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This narrative evidence-based review examines current progress in non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) for neonatal pain, a critical factor influencing neurodevelopment and long-term health. NPIs offer safer alternatives to pharmacologic treatments in this vulnerable population. This review summarises advances in auditory approaches (white noise, maternal voice), oral-tactile strategies (non-nutritive sucking, oral glucose/sucrose), tactile interventions (kangaroo care) Yongxue Cai and positional support. These methods alleviate pain by activating endogenous opioid pathways, reducing stress hormone responses and recreating intrauterine-like sensory environments that modulate nociception. Collectively, NPIs reduce behavioral and physiological indicators of pain, enhance sensory integration and promote autonomic stability. Despite their benefits, challenges remain, including heterogeneous study designs, limited sample sizes and clinical constraints such as inadequate provider training and resource limitations in neonatal intensive care units. Future work should focus on large, standardised trials to establish optimal intervention protocols. Integration of neuroimaging and molecular tools may clarify central mechanisms, while personalised approaches using real-time physiological data could support precision pain management. Strengthening the evidence base will enable NPIs to evolve from empirically used techniques into standardised, neuroprotective strategies that improve both immediate comfort and long-term outcomes for neonates.

Indexed as

auditory interventionsneonatal painneurodevelopmental outcomesnon-pharmaceutical interventionsprecision medicinetactile stimulation

Identifiers

PMID41978587
PMCPMC13070334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.