Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41978570›Full record

ArticleAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2026

Short- and Long-Term Patient Perceptions Relative to Hyaluronic Acid Filler Volume Retention.

Salman Khan, Theodore E Habarth-Morales, Malia Voytik, Harrison Davis, Robyn B Broach, Ivona Percec

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Theodore E Habarth-Morales
Malia Voytik
Harrison Davis
Robyn B Broach
Ivona Percec

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The efficacy and longevity of hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers is well supported by previous studies evaluating patient-reported outcomes (PROs). However, the longitudinal relationship between patient perceptions and physical volume retention remains unknown. Objectives: To assess the short-term relationship between patient perception and measurable volume loss across facial regions and to evaluate long-term satisfaction and treatment-seeking behavior after filler injection. Methods: A prospective study enrolled female patients ages 40-65 who received HA fillers to four facial regions using three different products. FACE-Q surveys and 3D imaging were obtained at baseline, immediately post-injection, and at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 3 months. Relative changes in volume and PRO scores were analyzed using univariate methods. A long-term follow-up survey was administered 2-5 years post-treatment. Results: A total of 101 patients were included. Discordance between objective volume retention and matched PRO scores was observed in the malar and upper perioral regions, where perceived improvement persisted despite volume loss. The lips showed initial alignment between perception and volume, which diverged over time. The lower perioral region exhibited the most proportional decline in satisfaction to volume loss. FACE-Q psychological function and ageing appraisal domains demonstrated greater durability than measured volume. Among 35 long-term respondents, 67% reported increased likelihood to seek additional treatments, while cost was the main barrier among those who did not. Conclusions: Patient satisfaction often outlasts objective filler volume in select regions. These results could guide patient-provider discussions on treatment frequency for different facial regions, as perceived benefits may persist beyond measurable correction. Level of Evidence: 2 (Therapeutic).

Identifiers

PMID41978570
PMCPMC13070674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.