Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41978560›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of general practice2026

The impact of professional characteristics and person-centred care on general practitioners' stress levels. Findings from the cross-sectional PACE GP/FP study in 24 European countries.

Katarzyna Nessler, Krzysztof Studzinski, Zalika Klemenc-Ketiš, Heather L Rogers, Torunn Bjerve Eide, Sara Ares Blanco, Heidrun Lingner, Sanda Kreitmayer, Jesús González-Lama, Esther Van Poel and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of general practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Katarzyna NesslerDepartment of Family Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9869-7923
Krzysztof StudzinskiDepartment of Family Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2486-4212
Zalika Klemenc-KetišLjubljana Community Health Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-0270-1754
Heather L RogersBiocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Bizkaia, Barakaldo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7562-4542
Torunn Bjerve EideDepartment of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5712-1415
Sara Ares BlancoFederica Montseny Health Centre, Gerencia Asistencial Atención Primaria, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4984-8788
Heidrun LingnerDepartment of Medical Psychologie, Center for Public Health and Healthcare, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2074-0367
Sanda KreitmayerDepartment for General and Family Medicine, Public Health Center "Dr M. Sehovic" Tuzla, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina.ORCID 0000-0002-5083-3049
Jesús González-LamaMaimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Córdoba (IMIBIC), Reina Sofía University Hospital, Córdoba University, Córdoba, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6033-9677
Esther Van PoelDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-8470-9214
Didem KafadarCerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Fatih/İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-8004-5609
Kathryn HoffmannDepartment of Primary Care Medicine, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8760-4250
Thomas FreseInstitute of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle/Saale, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9745-5690
Radost AssenovaDepartment Urology and General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0003-2158-5792
Mehmet UnganDepartment of Family Medicine, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-6078-2177
Gorka VuletićDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University J. J. Strossmayer in Osijek, Osijek, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-6804-6860
Erika ZelkoFaculty of Medicine, Institut of General Medicine, JKU Linz, Linz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-2730-9118
Rosa Megallón-BotayaAragones Group of Research in Primary Health Care (GAIAP), Institute for Health Research Aragon (IISAragon), Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5494-6550
Marion TomičićDepartment of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Split, Split, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0003-2148-3227
Fatima Mendez LopezAragones Group of Research in Primary Health Care (GAIAP), Institute for Health Research Aragon (IISAragon), Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6409-9041
Zoi TsimtsiouDepartment of Hygiene, Social-Preventive Medicine and Medical Statistics, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-9626-9295
Miguel J MoraCueva Torres Health Center, Gerencia de Atención Primaria de Gran Canaria, Servicio Canario de Salud, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0009-0000-8576-383X
Vinita MahtaniResearch Unit University Hospital Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria and Primary Care. Canary Islands Health Care Services, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0194-0507
Ewa WójtowiczDepartment of Family Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5991-0047
Adam WindakDepartment of Family Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9844-8935
Goranka PetričekDepartment of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-6614-3085

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeneral practitioners (GPs) face numerous challenges that can contribute to stress. Understanding these factors is crucial for developing interventions to support physician wellbeing and maintain high-quality care.

objectivesThe study aims to explore the factors associated with perceived stress among European GPs, including attitudes towards person-centred care (PCC), demographics, and professional characteristics.

methodsThe PACE GP/FP study is an online, cross-sectional, multi-centred survey conducted in 24 European countries between November 2022 and January 2024. The survey tool included the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), the Patient-Practitioner Orientation Scale (PPOS), and questions on GPs' demographics and practice characteristics. Linear mixed models analysed the relationship between these variables and perceived stress.

resultsIn total, 3522 GPs were included in the analysis. The mean PSS score indicated moderate levels of stress. Female gender and younger age were associated with increased stress. Also, a higher number of daily patient contacts and a greater perceived responsibility for vulnerable patient populations (e.g. migrants, those with limited social support, or psychiatric vulnerabilities) were significantly associated with higher stress. A stronger patient-centred orientation was associated with lower perceived stress.

conclusionThe findings have implications for interventions to reduce GP stress, such as training programs promoting PCC, optimising patient contact rates, and providing targeted support for GPs caring for vulnerable patients. Further research is needed to explore these factors' complex interplay and impact on GP wellbeing.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelGeneral PractitionersOccupational StressPatient-Centered CareStress, PsychologicalAdultAge FactorsCross-Sectional StudiesEuropeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSex FactorsSubjective StressSurveys and Questionnairesgeneral practicePACE GP/FP studyperceived stressperson-centred carePrimary care

Identifiers

PMID41978560
PMCPMC13081335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.