ArticleThe oncologist2026
Impact of geriatric covariates on metronomic cyclophosphamide efficacy and tolerance-the CHEMETROLD study.
Article in The oncologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMetronomic cyclophosphamide is sometimes considered in older or frail patients with advanced cancer when disease-related symptoms affect quality of life and standard treatments are no longer suitable. While clinical feedback on its tolerance and efficacy is often positive, the evidence remains limited in geriatric, comorbid populations. PATIENTS AND
methodsThis retrospective, monocentric study evaluated the impact of patient-, tumour-, and treatment-related characteristics on the efficacy and safety of metronomic cyclophosphamide in patients aged ≥70 years with metastatic solid tumors. Baseline geriatric assessments were collected, and treatment exposure, tolerance, and outcomes were analyzed. An exploratory subgroup analysis focused on patients treated for ≥9 months.
resultsThirty-seven patients (median age 84 years, range 70-96) were included: 15 had prostate cancer (40.5%), 8 breast cancer (21.6%), and 14 other primary tumors (37.8%). The median treatment duration was 4 months; the median progression-free survival was 4 months and 6 months in breast and prostate cancer subgroups. Overall dose intensity was 87%, with 62.2% of patients maintaining ≥90%. Treatment was generally well tolerated; only 5 grade ≥3 toxicities were reported, and 83.7% of patients remained at home during therapy. Notably, patients treated for ≥9 months had a poorer performance status and lower functional scores at baseline. No specific molecular alterations were associated with prolonged treatment benefit.
conclusionMetronomic cyclophosphamide appears to be a safe and potentially effective option in older and frail patients with metastatic cancer, including those with limited functional reserve. These findings support its use as a pragmatic alternative to supportive care, even in late disease stages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.