Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41978394›Full record

ReviewBeijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences2026

[Clinical strategies for perioperative management of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the immunotherapy era].

Hao Fu, Luyan Shen, Bingyang Huang, Shaohua Ma

Abstract readReviewEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Review in Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hao FuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Beijing Cancer Hospital & Beijing Institute for Cancer Research, Beijing 100142, China.
Luyan ShenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Beijing Cancer Hospital & Beijing Institute for Cancer Research, Beijing 100142, China.
Bingyang HuangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Beijing Cancer Hospital & Beijing Institute for Cancer Research, Beijing 100142, China.
Shaohua MaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Beijing Cancer Hospital & Beijing Institute for Cancer Research, Beijing 100142, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a highly prevalent and lethal malignancy in China and other East Asian countries. For patients with locally advanced disease, neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery has become the standard treatment paradigm. However, despite improvements in local tumor control and surgical outcomes, long-term survival remains unsatisfactory, largely due to the high incidence of distant metastasis and systemic disease progression. Therefore, optimizing perioperative systemic therapy represents a critical unmet clinical need in ESCC. In recent years, the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has profoundly reshaped the perioperative treatment landscape of ESCC. This review comprehensively summarizes recent clinical advances in perioperative immunotherapy for ESCC, including neoadjuvant immunotherapy alone, neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy, neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemoradiotherapy, and postoperative adjuvant immunotherapy. Current data indicate that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy remains highly effective in improving local control, downstaging tumors, and increasing the rate of R0 resection. Nevertheless, its ability to translate these advantages into durable survival benefit is limited, and distant recurrence remains a major cause of treatment failure. In contrast, neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy has demonstrated a marked improvement in pathological complete response (pCR) rates across multiple early-phase trials. More importantly, this strategy appears to provide supe-rior systemic disease control, thereby reducing the risk of distant metastasis and offering a promising avenue for improving long-term survival. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemoradiotherapy has shown further enhancement of local response and tumor regression; however, this approach is asso-ciated with increased treatment-related toxicity, and robust evidence supporting a clear survival advantage is still lacking. As a result, the optimal integration of radiotherapy into immunotherapy-based perioperative regimens remains an area of active investigation. Given the heterogeneity of ESCC, perioperative treatment strategies should evolve toward individualized, risk-adapted approaches. For patients with a high local tumor burden (advanced T stage), the incorporation of radiotherapy may be beneficial to reinforce local control and improve resectability. Conversely, for patients with extensive lymph node involvement (advanced N stage) and a high risk of distant relapse, immunotherapy-based systemic treatment should be prioritized. In the postoperative setting, adjuvant immunotherapy has been shown to improve outcomes in patients who fail to achieve pCR after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Looking forward, the integration of dynamic biomarkers, such as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), along with the identification of novel immune targets and predictive biomarkers, is expected to further refine patient selection and optimize precision perioperative treatment strategies for ESCC.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaImmunotherapyHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsNeoadjuvant TherapyPathologic Complete ResponsePerioperative CareImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsEsophageal squamous cell carcinomaNeoadjuvant immunotherapyPathological complete responsePerioperative therapy

Identifiers

PMID41978394
PMCPMC13077342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.