ArticleNucleic acids research2026
Slx4 and Fun30/SMARCAD1 coordinate S-phase checkpoint regulation and replication fork protection in response to Top1-DNA crosslinks.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Replication stress is a major driver of genomic instability and contributes to diseases such as cancer. It triggers the S-phase checkpoint, a signaling pathway that coordinates the handling of replication obstacles with cell cycle progression. One prominent source of replication stress is the formation of DNA-protein crosslinks on the template, such as those induced by DNA topoisomerase I poisoning by camptothecin (CPT). Here, we investigated how the S-phase checkpoint responds to CPT-induced replication stress. We show that both activation and timely deactivation of checkpoint signaling are critical for DNA replication completion and cell viability. Using a locus-specific approach, we found that checkpoint signaling is actively dampened at lesion sites. Mechanistically, this attenuation involves the displacement of the checkpoint mediator Rad9 by the DNA repair factors Slx4 and Fun30. This local dampening not only promotes cell cycle progression, but also permits Exo1-dependent resection of replication forks stalled by Top1-DNA crosslinks. Controlled resection, in turn, allows homologous recombination factors to access and stabilize the forks, preventing their degradation. We propose that local checkpoint dampening by Slx4 and Fun30 at replication stress sites is a critical mechanism that promotes replication completion and preserves genome stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.