Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41978264›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2026

Shape-constrained, changepoint additive models for time series omics data with cpam.

Luke A Yates, Jazmine L Humphreys, Michael A Charleston, Steven M Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Luke A YatesSchool of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Sandy Bay 7001, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1685-3169
Jazmine L HumphreysSchool of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Sandy Bay 7001, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3546-887X
Michael A CharlestonSchool of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Sandy Bay 7001, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8385-341X
Steven M SmithSchool of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Sandy Bay 7001, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5661-9994

Funding

Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Plant Success in Nature and Agriculture CE200100015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Time series omics experiments are critical for studying a range of biological processes, such as cell differentiation and developmental programs or responses to pathogens and environmental cues. While statistical tools for differential analysis across static conditions have matured, a comparable comprehensive methodology is lacking for time series data. Here, we introduce cpam, a novel method and user-friendly R package that performs temporal differential analysis of omics time series data, including pseudobulked single-cell sequence data. Powerful features include change-point detection and shape-constrained temporal trend estimation to allocate omics data into similar clusters. The software handles case-only and case-control designs, incorporates quantification uncertainty, and provides an interactive interface with customisable visualisations, offering graphical and statistical insight into molecular processes. Performance evaluation shows that cpam outperforms existing time series methods in terms of control of the false discovery rate versus power to detect temporal changes and accurate changepoint estimation. Application to published data illustrates RNA isoform-level modelling with high-resolution clustering during human embryogenesis and the identification of 910 novel genes that respond to excess-light in Arabidopsis.

Indexed as

GenomicsSoftwareAlgorithmsArabidopsisEmbryonic DevelopmentGene Expression ProfilingHumansSingle-Cell Analysis

Identifiers

PMID41978264
PMCPMC13076231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.