Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41978248›Full record

ReviewPain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain2026

Phenol Neurolysis in Pain and Palliative Medicine.

Jeroen H A Creemers, Rachel J H Smits, Alopi M Patel, Robert T M van Dongen, Cornelis K Kramers, Jacqueline M Bos, Selina E I van der Wal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jeroen H A CreemersDepartment of Internal Medicine, CWZ, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0371-8416
Rachel J H SmitsDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain- and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1054-3087
Alopi M PatelDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0922-3350
Robert T M van DongenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain- and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4437-5600
Cornelis K KramersDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, CWZ, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5398-6414
Jacqueline M BosDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, CWZ, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Selina E I van der WalDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain- and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6899-9314

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPain is a common symptom in palliative care and affects patients' quality of life considerably. Standard analgesics are sometimes insufficient and are associated with substantial side effects. Neurolysis, the targeted destruction of nerves using thermal or chemical agents, offers an additional option for managing localized pain in palliative care. Phenol, a widely available chemical neurolytic agent known for its painless injection and hyperbaric properties when dissolved in glycerin, can effectively relieve refractory cancer pain.

methodsA literature review was conducted on the pharmacology, toxicology, and indications of phenol in interventional pain and palliative medicine.

resultsDespite its use as a neurolytic agent for nearly a century, our current understanding of phenol's pharmacological properties, toxicity, and efficacy stems mainly from case series and small studies, often published decades ago. To date, no uniform guidelines exist, nor is there consensus on the optimal application of phenol in clinical practice, resulting in variability among practitioners. Chronic pain syndromes affect up to 30% of the global population, prompting the expansion of phenol neurolysis to new applications, such as joint denervation and sympathetic blocks in non-cancer pain. Understanding the mechanism of action of phenol and standardizing its clinical use are crucial for integrating this technique into broader pain management strategies.

conclusionThis review provides a comprehensive overview of the mechanisms, indications, benefits, and safety of phenol neurolysis in pain and palliative medicine, aiming to support its evidence-based use in clinical practice.

Indexed as

PainPain ManagementPalliative CarePalliative MedicinePhenolHumansPhenol

Identifiers

PMID41978248
PMCPMC13077028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.