Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41978154›Full record

ArticleNutrients2026

Association Between Dietary Animal Protein and Depression in a General Population.

Sunghee Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sunghee LeeDepartment of Food and Nutrition, College of Health Science, Kangwon National University, Samcheok 25945, Gangwon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8703-5852

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesBecause of conflicting evidence about the effects of protein sources on mental health, this study aimed to investigate whether animal or plant protein intake is associated with depression.

methodsAmong 17,125 adults (7287 men and 9838 women) from nationally representative survey data, the primary measure of depression was determined with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. A 24-h recall method was employed for dietary assessment. The associations between tertile ranges of animal or plant protein and depression were analyzed with weighted logistic models, adjusted for potential confounders.

resultsDespite no association among men, women in the uppermost tertile of animal protein intake demonstrated a 36% lower likelihood of having depression [95% confidence interval 0.48-0.86]. Additionally, participants older than 65 years presented a significant trend toward lower likelihoods of depression associated with animal protein intake.

conclusionsThis large cross-sectional study of the general population revealed that, regarding one of the common psychological disorders-depression-animal protein intake might have a beneficial association.

Indexed as

Animal Proteins, DietaryDepressionDietDietary ProteinsAdultAgedAnimalsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultAnimal Proteins, DietaryDietary Proteinsanimal proteindepressiongeneral populationplant proteinprotein intakepsychological disorder

Identifiers

PMID41978154
PMCPMC13074892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.