ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Deep Learning-Based Method for Stress Measurement Using Longitudinal Critically Refracted Waves.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate stress measurement is essential to evaluating structural integrity and plays a pivotal role in the health monitoring and predicting the service life of steel infrastructures. This study proposes a deep learning approach for stress prediction based on longitudinal critically refracted (LCR) ultrasonic waves. The model integrates gated recurrent units (GRU), attention mechanisms, and one-dimensional convolutional neural networks (1D-CNN), enabling direct stress prediction from raw ultrasonic signals without the need for manual feature extraction or explicit physical modeling. To validate the approach, LCR signals were acquired using a custom-built piezoelectric ultrasonic system from 20# steel specimens subjected to uniaxial stresses ranging from 0 to 200 MPa. A dataset comprising 4200 samples was augmented to enhance training efficiency. The proposed model achieved a mean absolute error of 1.94 MPa. Generalization tests demonstrated high accuracy across diverse stress levels, with average errors below 3 MPa, highlighting the model's robustness. This research presents an accurate, intelligent, and calibration-free ultrasonic method for stress evaluation, providing practical support for stress evaluation in steel structures under actual operating conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.