ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Noninvasive Measurement of Infant Respiration During Sleep: A Validation Study.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Infant respiration is a physiological marker of health and wellbeing that can provide insight into sleep and wake patterns. Technological innovation presents opportunities to enhance measurements of physiological signals, which improves ecological validity and participant experiences. This is particularly true in the context of studying infant sleep, as it can be disrupted by changes in the environment and the physical sensation of unfamiliar or uncomfortable sensors. The goal of this study was to examine if a commercially available video baby monitor (Nanit system) can accurately estimate respiration during a nap relative to a commonly used cardiorespiratory sensor (Isansys Lifetouch sensor). Thirty-three infants (M = 9.7 months; range = 1-22 months) took a nap while wearing the Lifetouch sensor and Nanit Breathing Band. Infants slept in view of the Nanit camera. A computer vision algorithm applied to the video detected movement of the patterns on the fabric band worn around the infant's torso to determine respiratory rates. The results showed strong consistency between the devices. More than 95% of the minute-by-minute respiration data fell within the limits of agreement, with little bias. Agreement was not influenced by age or nap duration, suggesting the Nanit Breathing Band provides a valid measure of respiration across infancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.