ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Turbofan Engine Remaining Useful Life Prediction with Reliable Prediction Intervals via LSTM-Based Quantile Regression and Conformal Calibration.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To overcome the inability of point estimates to adequately characterize uncertainty and the unstable coverage of prediction intervals in turbofan engine remaining useful life (RUL) prediction, this study proposes an LSTM-based quantile regression framework (LSTM-QR). The framework generates a point prediction together with upper and lower predictive bounds in a single forward pass, thereby directly constructing a prediction interval with a nominal coverage of 80%. During training, a weighted pinball loss and an overestimation penalty are introduced to improve the robustness of quantile estimation. During inference, Conformalized Quantile Regression (CQR) is further applied for post hoc interval calibration. Experiments on the NASA C-MAPSS dataset show that the proposed method maintains stable point-prediction performance while substantially improving interval reliability after calibration. Under the same operating condition, PICP increases from 0.590 ± 0.035 to 0.800 ± 0.026 for FD001 → FD001 and from 0.722 ± 0.050 to 0.793 ± 0.032 for FD002 → FD002, corresponding to gains of 21.0 and 7.1 percentage points, respectively, with calibrated RMSE values of 16.235 ± 1.297 and 18.323 ± 0.411. Under cross-condition transfer, where the raw intervals exhibit clear under-coverage, CQR further raises PICP from 0.696 ± 0.046 to 0.806 ± 0.032 for FD001 → FD002 and from 0.593 ± 0.071 to 0.803 ± 0.021 for FD002 → FD001, corresponding to gains of 11.0 and 21.0 percentage points, respectively, while preserving RMSE at 21.758 ± 1.208 and 17.562 ± 0.062. These results indicate that the proposed method provides more reliable and interpretable prediction intervals under varying operating conditions, thereby offering effective support for predictive maintenance decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.