ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Multi-Center Trained Residual Neural Network for Robust Classification of Atrial High-Rate Episodes in Remotely Monitored Pacemakers and Defibrillators.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Remote monitoring of pacemakers and defibrillators increases patient safety but also increases clinical workload. Review of atrial high-rate episodes is particularly demanding as episodes can contain atrial tachycardia or atrial fibrillation (AT/AF), noise, or far-field oversensing (FFO). Automatic review of atrial high-rate episodes by an Artificial Intelligence (AI) model can decrease the workload of remote monitoring, provided it maintains high sensitivity for true atrial tachycardia. A residual network is trained using a center-level fourfold cross validation. The four resulting models achieved a precision of 97.2-99.4% for AT/AF, 93.1-97.7% for noise, and 75.4-94.4% for FFO, while maintaining high sensitivity 98.9-99.3% for AT/AF. The four models were combined through averaging prediction probabilities to create an ensemble model. Thresholding ensemble predictions with probability > 95% resulted in a robust ensemble model that made only two errors (<0.1%) after reviewing 3925 episodes (91.9%) of the total 4271 episodes. This shows how AI models can reliably assist in remote monitoring. Future research should be aimed at classification models for other episode types and clinical validation of AI models to assist remote monitoring of pacemakers and defibrillators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.