Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41978017›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Adsorptive Gas Sensor Response Forecasting to Enable Breath-by-Breath Analysis.

Samuel Bellaire, Samir Rawashdeh, Kirby P Mayer, Jamie L Sturgill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Samuel BellaireCollege of Engineering & Computer Science, University of Michigan-Dearborn, Dearborn, MI 48128, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5335-7183
Samir RawashdehCollege of Engineering & Computer Science, University of Michigan-Dearborn, Dearborn, MI 48128, USA.
Kirby P MayerDepartment of Physical Therapy, College of Health Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA.
Jamie L SturgillDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8856-3227

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MOS gas sensors have proven to be useful in electronic noses, which utilize these sensors to detect volatile organic compounds in human breath to detect various lung diseases. Unfortunately, the long settling time of MOS gas sensors is ill-suited to measuring human breath, where complete breathing cycles are often shorter than 5 s. Existing studies circumvent this limitation by collecting gas samples and injecting them into a sealed chamber to react with the sensors. However, it would be convenient if breath-by-breath analysis could be conducted without the need to store breath samples. To accomplish this, we present a novel forecasting methodology to predict the final value t∞ of a gas sensor's response based on its initial transient behavior. To do this, we present and validate a second-order mathematical model of the sensors' response characteristics, which we then use in our preliminary work using neural networks to predict the final sensor value. Although some challenges were encountered, the initial results are encouraging, and we plan to extend our study in the future to collect a more expansive dataset and explore the use of other types of machine learning algorithms for this application.

Indexed as

Electronic NoseGasesAdsorptionAlgorithmsBreath TestsHumansNeural Networks, ComputerPrediction AlgorithmsVolatile Organic CompoundsGasesVolatile Organic Compoundselectronic noseE-noseforecastinggas sensorsMOS gas sensors

Identifiers

PMID41978017
PMCPMC13075263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.