ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Multi-Band Temperature Measurement Data Retrieval Method Based on the Chaotic Artificial Hummingbird Algorithm (CAHA).
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To address the challenges of data processing caused by uncertain emissivity in multispectral radiation thermometry, this paper proposes a temperature retrieval method based on the Chaotic Artificial Hummingbird Algorithm (CAHA). Without relying on an assumed emissivity model, the method can automatically identify the emissivity distribution and selects the optimal output through multiple iterations to enhance accuracy. Simulations and offline tests conducted on rocket nozzles demonstrate that CAHA maintains high accuracy both in noise-free conditions and under 5% noise, with a single execution time of approximately 0.15 s. Furthermore, the method is validated through experiments on blackbody sources and candle flames: the relative error in retrieved temperature for blackbody sources remains below 0.93%, while the retrieved outer flame temperature of candle flames shows a relative error of 0.66% compared with thermocouple measurements. Combining high precision with rapid computation, this method is suitable for practical applications in radiation thermometry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.