Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41977980›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Performance Analysis of Advanced Feature Extraction Methods for Manufacturing Defect Detection via Vibration Sensors in CNC Milling Machines.

Gürkan Bilgin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Gürkan BilginDepartment of Electrical-Electronics Engineering, Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, 15200 Burdur, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-8441-1557

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the effectiveness of various feature extraction methods applied to vibration signals for the automatic detection of production defects in CNC (Computerised Numerical Control) milling machines. A dataset consisting of real-world data collected from CNC machines equipped with accelerometers was used. The objective of the study is to compare three main groups of techniques: time-domain analysis (TDA), frequency-domain analysis (FDA), and time-frequency-domain analysis (TFA). The findings indicate that basic TDA features lack the necessary sensitivity to accurately distinguish between Good Processing (GP) and Bad Processing (BP) states. Frequency-domain methods, such as the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT), median frequency calculation, and the Welch periodogram, provide better insights but still have limitations. The most effective results are obtained with TFA methods, particularly Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD) and the Hilbert-Huang Transform (HHT), which reveal deeper signal characteristics. Following the feature optimisation studies, it was determined that a combination of four features-FMED, IMF2, IMF5 and WPT26-yielded the optimal performance, with an accuracy of 91.48%. The incorporation of a fifth feature resulted in information saturation within the model and did not improve performance. This study makes a novel contribution to literature by conducting an in-depth investigation into the most effective feature extraction and selection techniques for achieving robust discrimination between GP and BP productions using vibration signals in CNC milling processes. Conclusively, TFA features, supported by advanced signal processing, offer a strong basis for reliable, automated defect detection in CNC milling operations.

Indexed as

CNC milling machinesempirical mode decompositionfrequency-domain analysisHilbert–Huang transformprocess qualitysignal feature extractiontime-domain analysistime–frequency-domain analysisvibration signals

Identifiers

PMID41977980
PMCPMC13075307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.