Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41977964›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Monitoring Inputs, Control Architectures, and Failure Modes in Closed-Loop Vasopressor Systems: A Comprehensive Review.

Vitor Felippe, Hiorrana Sousa Dias, Carlos Darcy Alves Bersot, Gustavo Guimaraes Torres, Bruno Wegner, Gabriel Lemos González, Gustavo Wegner, Marcos Adriano Lessa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vitor FelippeDepartment of Anesthesiology, National Cancer Institute (INCA), Rio de Janeiro 20230-130, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0007-6666-5418
Hiorrana Sousa DiasSchool of Medicine, Centro Universitário Christus (UNICHRISTUS), Fortaleza 60192-345, CE, Brazil.
Carlos Darcy Alves BersotDepartment of Anesthesiology, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Campos dos Goytacazes, Campos dos Goytacazes 28030-002, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0464-7990
Gustavo Guimaraes TorresFaculty of Medical Sciences, Hospital Universitário Pedro Ernesto, State University of Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro 20551-030, RJ, Brazil.
Bruno WegnerFaculty of Medicine, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre 90610-264, RS, Brazil.
Gabriel Lemos GonzálezSchool of Medicine and Surgery, Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO), Rio de Janeiro 20270-330, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0005-1788-8514
Gustavo WegnerFaculty of Medicine, Federal University of Fronteira Sul (UFFS), Passo Fundo 99010-200, RS, Brazil.
Marcos Adriano LessaDepartment of Anesthesia, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Closed-loop vasopressor systems integrate real-time blood pressure monitoring with automated decision logic to support hemodynamic stability in perioperative and critical care environments. These technologies sit at the intersection of biomedical sensing, signal processing, and clinician-supervised automation: the quality, latency, and failure behavior of the monitoring input can directly shape controller performance, safety margins, and clinical usability. In this comprehensive review, we synthesize the major closed-loop vasopressor architectures reported in the literature, examine how sensor modality and signal integrity influence algorithm behavior, and summarize recurrent reliability vulnerabilities spanning sensors, control logic, and device integration. We organize the field through an end-to-end information pipeline-monitoring input, signal conditioning and quality assessment, decision and control strategy, actuation via infusion technology, and supervisory safety layers-highlighting common performance metrics used to benchmark control quality. We then discuss clinical validation patterns across settings, emphasizing practical considerations for deployment and the evidence gaps that remain most relevant to high-risk populations. Finally, we propose reporting and validation priorities for future studies, with a focus on sensor robustness, transparency of algorithm design, integration safeguards, and standardized documentation of failures and overrides.

Indexed as

Vasoconstrictor AgentsAlgorithmsHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicVasoconstrictor Agentsautomationclosed-loop controlfailure modeshemodynamic monitoringperioperative technologyreliabilitysignal integrityvasopressor

Identifiers

PMID41977964
PMCPMC13075136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.