ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Active-Assistive Control Based on Dynamic Moving Window for Trajectory Tracking of an Upper Limb Exoskeleton in Assisted Rehabilitation.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rehabilitation robotics faces the challenges of aligning engineering design with patient-specific needs. Most existing controllers in rehabilitation robots often constrain motion to fixed paths or provide only passive guidance, limiting user engagement and adaptability. This study proposes a novel active-assistive mode controller that integrates a virtual tunnel-based force generation mechanism with a dynamic moving-window technique for tracking activities of daily living (ADL) trajectories. Unlike conventional impedance controllers, the proposed method dynamically adjusts the virtual tunnel in real time, permitting voluntary upper-limb movement within a safe operational range while preventing excessive deviation. The system was implemented on a wearable two-degree-of-freedom (DOF) upper-limb exoskeleton equipped with drive and integrated sensor units. Experimental results demonstrated that decreasing the guidance force (Fgf) increased tracking errors, from 1° at 100% Fgf to 5° at 30% Fgf, indicating greater voluntary participant motion. Peak actuator torques correspondingly decreased from 14.75 to 13.43 Nm (elbow) and from 4.14 to 2.48 Nm (wrist), confirming the controller's capability to modulate robotic assistance according to user effort. Tests with 30 healthy participants demonstrated the effectiveness of guidance along predefined ADL trajectories, validating the controller's potential for patient-centered rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.