ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Novel Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Method for Electronic Nose Design Based on Olfactometry Data.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electronic nose systems are advanced technological tools that enable the objective evaluation of odors through sensor arrays mimicking the human olfactory mechanism and sophisticated data processing algorithms. These systems facilitate rapid, reproducible, and standardized measurement of chemical components in applications such as food safety, environmental monitoring, medical diagnostics, and industrial quality control. In this study, measurements obtained from electronic nose sensors were compared with olfactometry panelist assessments using n-butanol as a reference substance in accordance with the TS EN 13725 standard. Furthermore, machine learning algorithms, including Partial Least Squares (PLS), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), were applied to model the sensor data and evaluate their predictive accuracy. The results demonstrated the reliability and applicability of the electronic nose system, achieving training mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values of 6.53% for PLS, 10.89% for SVR, and 0.15% for GPR. This study presents an innovative approach that systematically assesses the performance of electronic nose technology using a standardized reference odor and highlights the effectiveness of the modeling approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.