Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41977921›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Comparative Evaluation of YOLOv8 and YOLO11 for Image-Based Classification of Sugar Beet Seed Treatment Levels.

Cihan Unal, Ilkay Cinar, Zulfi Saripinar, Murat Koklu

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cihan UnalDepartment of Computer Programming, Hacettepe University, Sincan, Ankara 06909, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-5255-4078
Ilkay CinarDepartment of Computer Engineering, Selcuk University, Selcuklu, Konya 42130, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-0611-3316
Zulfi SaripinarTurkish Sugar Factories Corporation, Sugar Institute, Ankara 06810, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-5109-1393
Murat KokluDepartment of Computer Engineering, Selcuk University, Selcuklu, Konya 42130, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-2737-2360

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study addresses the automatic classification of sugar beet seeds according to their spraying levels using RGB images, aiming to enable a fast, practical, and non-destructive early warning system without chemical analysis. A dataset of 16,519 seed images acquired under controlled lighting conditions was used to evaluate YOLOv8-CLS and YOLO11-CLS architectures, including the n, s, m, l, and x scale variants within the Ultralytics framework. All experiments were conducted using a 10-fold cross-validation strategy, with models trained under different batch size and learning rate configurations. The results indicate that both architectures achieve reliable performance, with accuracy values ranging from approximately 78-83% for YOLOv8-CLS and 80-82% for YOLO11-CLS models. ROC-AUC scores consistently above 0.94 demonstrate strong inter-class discrimination. Misclassification analysis shows that errors mainly occur between visually similar intermediate treatment levels, particularly 25% and 50%. Despite this challenge, low log-loss values and balanced precision-recall profiles indicate stable decision behavior. Overall, the findings confirm that sugar beet seed treatment levels can be effectively distinguished using only RGB imagery, providing a potentially low-cost and scalable approach for early warning and quality control in seed treatment processes.

Indexed as

Beta vulgarisImage Processing, Computer-AssistedSeedsClassification AlgorithmsDetection Algorithmsdeep learningimage classificationsugar beet seedsYOLO11YOLOv8

Identifiers

PMID41977921
PMCPMC13075256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.