ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Hybrid
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Safe and energy-aware navigation is still difficult for unmanned surface vehicles (USVs), especially in cluttered waters where obstacles, smooth motion, and wind or current effects must be considered at the same time. If these issues are handled separately, the path may become longer and the vehicle may turn more often, which raises propulsion effort and hurts stability. To reduce these problems, a hybrid path planning method called θ∗-APF-Q is proposed, and it combines global planning, learning-based decisions, and local adjustment in a three-layer structure. First, an any-angle θ∗ global planner is employed to generate a near-optimal backbone trajectory by line-of-sight pruning, thereby reducing redundant waypoints and limiting detours. Second, an enhanced tabular Q-learning model is executed in an expanded eight-direction action space, and policy learning is guided by a multi-objective reward that jointly encourages distance reduction, alignment with ocean current and wind-induced forces for energy saving, smooth heading variation to suppress excessive steering, and maintenance of a safety margin near obstacles. Third, an adaptive artificial potential field (APF) module is used for real-time local correction, providing repulsion in high-risk regions and assisting trajectory smoothing to reduce unnecessary turning operations. A decision bias strategy further couples instantaneous APF forces with long-term state-action values, while the influence weight is adaptively adjusted according to environmental complexity. The algorithm is validated on the randomly generated marine grid maps and on the real-world satellite map scenario, with comparisons against a conventional four-direction Q-learning baseline. Across randomized tests, average path length, turning frequency, and the composite energy indicator are reduced by 22.3%, 55.6%, and 26.4%, respectively, and the success rate increases by 16%. The results indicate that integrating global guidance, adaptive learning, and local reactive decision making supports practical, energy-aware USV navigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.