ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Validation and Reproducibility of an App for Continuous Measurement as an Assessment Tool for Idiopathic Scoliosis.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
(1) Background: Idiopathic scoliosis is a three-dimensional deformity, yet clinical and research decision-making still relies largely on radiographic Cobb angle measurements. As a radiation-free alternative, clinical assessment of transverse and sagittal plane deformities has gained importance. This study evaluated the concurrent validity and intra- and interrater reproducibility of continuous measurements of rib hump, thoracic kyphosis, and lumbar lordosis obtained using a smartphone application in adolescents with spinal deformities. (2) Methods: Adolescents aged 10-17 years with scoliosis (>10° Cobb) or hyperkyphosis (>50° Cobb) were recruited. Continuous measurements of angle of trunk rotation (ATR) during the Adams forward bend test and in standing position, as well as sagittal profile, were collected using the ISICO app mounted on a standardized plastic tool. Concurrent validity was assessed against a scoliometer using Spearman correlation, root mean square error, and Bland-Altman analysis, while reproducibility was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients, standard error of measurement, and minimal detectable change. (3) Results: Thirty-two adolescents were included for validation and intrarater analyses and 34 for interrater analyses. ATR measured during the Adams test showed very high correlation with the scoliometer and minimal bias, while standing ATR showed moderate correlation. Reliability was excellent for rib hump during forward bending and moderate for sagittal parameters, with the lowest values observed for lumbar lordosis. (4) Conclusions: These findings support the clinical use of continuous app-based ATR assessment and suggest that sagittal measurements may be useful with appropriate examiner training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.