Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41977884›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Validation and Reproducibility of an App for Continuous Measurement as an Assessment Tool for Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Isis Juliene Rodrigues Leite Navarro, Louis Jacob, Kevin Masetto, Francesco Dulio, Andrea Negrini, Stefano Negrini, Fabio Zaina, Alessandra Negrini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Isis Juliene Rodrigues Leite NavarroISICO (Italian Scientific Spine Institute), 20141 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6158-8018
Louis JacobDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Lariboisière-Fernand Widal Hospital, AP-HP, Université Paris Cité, 75010 Paris, France.
Kevin MasettoISICO (Italian Scientific Spine Institute), 20141 Milan, Italy.
Francesco DulioISICO (Italian Scientific Spine Institute), 20141 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0009-0005-2092-5945
Andrea NegriniISICO (Italian Scientific Spine Institute), 20141 Milan, Italy.
Stefano NegriniISICO (Italian Scientific Spine Institute), 20141 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1878-2747
Fabio ZainaISICO (Italian Scientific Spine Institute), 20141 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1256-5362
Alessandra NegriniISICO (Italian Scientific Spine Institute), 20141 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9195-9019

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Idiopathic scoliosis is a three-dimensional deformity, yet clinical and research decision-making still relies largely on radiographic Cobb angle measurements. As a radiation-free alternative, clinical assessment of transverse and sagittal plane deformities has gained importance. This study evaluated the concurrent validity and intra- and interrater reproducibility of continuous measurements of rib hump, thoracic kyphosis, and lumbar lordosis obtained using a smartphone application in adolescents with spinal deformities. (2) Methods: Adolescents aged 10-17 years with scoliosis (>10° Cobb) or hyperkyphosis (>50° Cobb) were recruited. Continuous measurements of angle of trunk rotation (ATR) during the Adams forward bend test and in standing position, as well as sagittal profile, were collected using the ISICO app mounted on a standardized plastic tool. Concurrent validity was assessed against a scoliometer using Spearman correlation, root mean square error, and Bland-Altman analysis, while reproducibility was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients, standard error of measurement, and minimal detectable change. (3) Results: Thirty-two adolescents were included for validation and intrarater analyses and 34 for interrater analyses. ATR measured during the Adams test showed very high correlation with the scoliometer and minimal bias, while standing ATR showed moderate correlation. Reliability was excellent for rib hump during forward bending and moderate for sagittal parameters, with the lowest values observed for lumbar lordosis. (4) Conclusions: These findings support the clinical use of continuous app-based ATR assessment and suggest that sagittal measurements may be useful with appropriate examiner training.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsScoliosisAdolescentChildFemaleHumansKyphosisMaleReproducibility of Resultsclinical assessmentmobile applicationsposturereliability studyscoliosisvalidation study

Identifiers

PMID41977884
PMCPMC13074772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.