SynthesisSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Systematic Review of Safety-Driven Approaches in Human-Robot Collaborative Systems.
Synthesis in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Collaboration between humans and robots (HRC) is advancing rapidly due to the intersection of robotics and generative artificial intelligence (GenAI). The current paper includes a systematic review of 103 studies on the role of generative models, including Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), Variational Autoencoders (VAEs), diffusion models, and Large Language Models (LLMs) in improving the safety, trust, and adaptability of collaborative robotics using a PRISMA-based systematic approach. The review recognizes four major themed areas of GenAI-based safety frameworks-namely, data-driven simulation to synthesize hazards, predictive reasoning to forecast human motion, adaptive control to reduce risks dynamically, and trust-aware cognition to explain human-robot interaction. Findings indicate that generative models transform robotic safety from a reactive mechanism to proactive, contextual and interpretable systems. Nevertheless, real-time performance, interpretability, standard benchmarking, and ethical assurance are still some of the challenges to be overcome. The paper proposes a taxonomy linking generative modeling layers and physical, cognitive and ethical aspects of HRC safety, and gives a roadmap of certifiable hybrid systems with generative foresight and deterministic control. This synthesis provides a foundation for developing transparent, adaptive, and trustworthy collaborative robotic systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.