Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41977857›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

An Uncertainty-Aware Temporal Transformer for Probabilistic Interval Modeling in Wind Power Forecasting.

Shengshun Sun, Meitong Chen, Mafangzhou Mo, Xu Yan, Ziyu Xiong, Yang Hu, Yan Zhan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shengshun SunSchool of Automation, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China.
Meitong ChenNational School of Development, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Mafangzhou MoNational School of Development, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Xu YanNational School of Development, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Ziyu XiongNational School of Development, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Yang HuChina Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China.
Yan ZhanNational School of Development, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 61202479
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Under high renewable energy penetration, wind power forecasting faces pronounced challenges due to strong randomness and uncertainty, making conventional point-forecast-centric paradigms insufficient for risk-aware and reliable power system scheduling. An uncertainty-aware temporal transformer framework for wind power forecasting is presented, integrating probabilistic modeling with deep temporal representation learning to jointly optimize prediction accuracy and uncertainty characterization. Crucially, rather than treating uncertainty quantification merely as a post-processing step, the central conceptual contribution lies in modularizing uncertainty directly within the attention mechanism. A probability-driven temporal attention mechanism is incorporated at the encoding stage to emphasize high-variability and high-risk time slices during feature aggregation, while a multi-quantile output and interval modeling strategy is adopted at the prediction stage to directly learn the conditional distribution of wind power, enabling simultaneous point and interval forecasts with statistical confidence. Extensive experiments on multiple public wind power datasets demonstrate that the proposed method consistently outperforms traditional statistical models, deep temporal models, and deterministic transformers, as validated by formal statistical significance testing. Specifically, the method achieves an MAE of 0.089, an RMSE of 0.132, and a MAPE of 10.84% on the test set, corresponding to reductions of approximately 8%-10% relative to the deterministic transformer. In uncertainty evaluation, a PICP of 0.91 is attained while compressing the MPIW to 0.221 and reducing the CWC to 0.241, indicating a favorable balance between coverage reliability and interval compactness. Compared with mainstream probabilistic forecasting methods, the model further reduces RMSE while maintaining coverage levels close to the 90% target, effectively mitigating excessive interval conservatism. Moreover, by adaptively generating heteroscedastic intervals that widen during high-volatility events and narrow under stable conditions, the model achieves a highly focused and effective capture of critical uncertainty information.

Indexed as

AI-driven data analyticsdata mining for energy systemsdeep learning for power systemstemporal transformerwind power forecasting

Identifiers

PMID41977857
PMCPMC13074702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.