Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41977750›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Response of Soil Quality and Microbial Community to In Situ Return of Vegetable Residues over Three Consecutive Cropping Seasons.

Haiying Wang, Zhizhuang An, Jianbin Liu, Liang Jin, Yan Li, Yu Hu, Jie Zhu, Mingjie Yao, Xuening Xu, Dan Wei and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Haiying WangInstitute of Plant Nutrition, Resources and Environment, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China.
Zhizhuang AnInstitute of Plant Nutrition, Resources and Environment, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China.
Jianbin LiuInstitute of Plant Nutrition, Resources and Environment, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China.
Liang JinInstitute of Plant Nutrition, Resources and Environment, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4544-7645
Yan LiHeilongjiang Academy of Black Soil Protection and Utilization, Harbin 150086, China.
Yu HuInstitute of Plant Nutrition, Resources and Environment, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China.
Jie ZhuCollege of Resources and Environment, Xinjiang Normal University, Wulumuqi 830054, China.
Mingjie YaoInstitute of Plant Nutrition, Resources and Environment, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China.
Xuening XuInstitute of Plant Nutrition, Resources and Environment, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China.
Dan WeiInstitute of Plant Nutrition, Resources and Environment, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China.
Jianli DingInstitute of Plant Nutrition, Resources and Environment, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China.

Funding

Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Science and Technology Innovation Capacity Building Special Fund No. KJCX20230422 and KJCX20230219Beijing Rural Revitalization Agricultural Science and Technology Project No. NY2502120325National Key R&D Program No. 2022YFD2002103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To analyze the effects of in situ vegetable residue return on soil properties and microorganisms, this study conducted a continuous three-season in situ residue return experiment with four treatments: no return (CK), residue return (HTJ), residue return + compound microbial inoculant (HTJS), and residue return + ammonia water (HTJN). This study compared the treatment effects on soil quality. The results showed that, after the third tillage, the HTJS treatment increased soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, and mineralizable organic carbon content, and significantly enhanced the activity of soil β-glucosidase and soil peroxidase, which are related to carbon cycling enzymes compared to other treatments. There were no significant differences in bacterial or fungal α-diversity among treatments. Differences in fungal community soil β-diversity among treatments were significant. The HTJS treatment enriched organic matter-degrading bacteria

Indexed as

in situ returnmicrobial community structuresoil quality indexvegetable residues

Identifiers

PMID41977750
PMCPMC13074782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.