ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Invasive Plants as Accumulators of Heavy Metals and Potentially Toxic Elements: A Review with Implications for Remediation.
Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Invasive plant species frequently dominate contaminated ecosystems and are increasingly reported as accumulators of heavy metals and potentially toxic elements (PTEs). While this phenomenon is widely documented, its functional implications for contaminant dynamics and remediation-oriented management remain insufficiently synthesized. This review provides a comprehensive assessment of heavy metal and PTE accumulation in invasive plants across terrestrial and aquatic environments, with emphasis on tissue-specific partitioning, environmental context, and species-level variability. Based on field surveys, controlled experiments, and biomonitoring studies, we synthesize evidence for the accumulation of key elements (As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn) in the roots and above-ground tissues of terrestrial and aquatic invasive plants. The available literature reveals consistent patterns of root-dominated sequestration in many terrestrial invaders, contrasted with enhanced shoot accumulation in fast-growing aquatic species. These patterns underpin divergent functional roles, ranging from contaminant stabilization in soils and sediments to conditional phytoextraction under managed harvesting. Rather than promoting invasive plants as remediation tools, this review frames them as unavoidable functional components of contaminated landscapes. We critically evaluate their advantages, limitations, and ecological risks, identify key research gaps, and propose a context-aware framework for interpreting invasive plant-PTE interactions in environmental management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.