Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41977722›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Comparative Evaluation of Allometric, Machine Learning, and Ensemble Approaches for Modeling Dynamic Structure-Fresh Weight Relationships in Sweet Pepper.

Jun Hyeun Kang, Taewon Moon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jun Hyeun KangSmart Farm Research Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Gangneung 25451, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8284-9304
Taewon MoonSmart Farm Research Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Gangneung 25451, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1593-7870

Funding

Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries RS-2025-02304283
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate fresh weight (FW) estimation is essential for growth monitoring and yield prediction in greenhouse fruit vegetables, but remains challenging due to the dynamic allocation between vegetative and reproductive organs. This study aimed to systematically evaluate modeling strategies for FW estimation in sweet pepper and identify which approach is most suitable under conditions of dynamic biomass partitioning. Non-destructive morphological measurements were collected under greenhouse cultivation, and allometric models based on geometric equations were established as baselines. Their performance was compared with machine learning (ML) models and ensemble learning frameworks. To address limited data availability, numerical data augmentation with Gaussian noise and a variational autoencoder was applied. Among the allometric models, the stick model combined with a sigmoid function showed the highest performance, with an R2 of 0.80 for shoot FW and 0.54 for fruit FW. All ML models outperformed the allometric models, and the ensemble model achieved the highest predictive accuracy, with an R2 of 0.96 for shoot FW and 0.89 for fruit FW. Data augmentation further improved predictive performance across all ML models, particularly for fruit FW prediction. Feature contribution analysis revealed that temporal progression was the dominant predictor of fruit FW, while structural traits played the primary role in shoot FW estimation. Ensemble-based ML, combined with data augmentation, provides a methodological framework for non-destructive FW estimation of sweet pepper in controlled environments such as greenhouses and smart farming systems.

Indexed as

allometric modeldata augmentationensemble learningfresh weight estimationmachine learningsweet pepper

Identifiers

PMID41977722
PMCPMC13074652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.