Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41977701›Full record

ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Does Epiphytic Lichen Translocation Work? Methods, Outcomes and Future Perspectives.

Sonia Ravera, Marta Agostini, Elisabetta Bianchi, Renato Benesperi, Erika Bellini, Patrizia Campisi, Luca Di Nuzzo, Juri Nascimbene, Luigi Sanità di Toppi, Monica Ruffini Castiglione and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Are Seasonal Acclimation and Genetic Variability ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sonia RaveraDepartment of Biological, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies (STeBiCeF), University of Palermo, Via Archirafi 38, 90123 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5223-7964
Marta AgostiniDepartment of Biology, University of Pisa, Via L. Ghini 13, 56126 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0009-0005-7839-3160
Elisabetta BianchiDepartment of Biology, University of Florence, Via La Pira 4, 50121 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1197-4081
Renato BenesperiDepartment of Biology, University of Florence, Via La Pira 4, 50121 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4296-3393
Erika BelliniDepartment of Biology, University of Pisa, Via L. Ghini 13, 56126 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6542-3897
Patrizia CampisiDepartment of Biological, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies (STeBiCeF), University of Palermo, Via Archirafi 38, 90123 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8684-4508
Luca Di NuzzoDepartment of Biological, Geological and Environmental Science, University of Bologna, Via Irnerio 42, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5558-9401
Juri NascimbeneDepartment of Biological, Geological and Environmental Science, University of Bologna, Via Irnerio 42, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
Luigi Sanità di ToppiDepartment of Biology, University of Pisa, Via L. Ghini 13, 56126 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8731-4904
Monica Ruffini CastiglioneDepartment of Biology, University of Pisa, Via L. Ghini 13, 56126 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3777-6596
Luca PaoliDepartment of Biology, University of Pisa, Via L. Ghini 13, 56126 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5479-6428

Funding

National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP) "Fund for the National Research Program and for Projects of National Interest (NRP)" Italian Ministry of Education call PRIN 2022 PNRR P2022LJMCC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epiphytic lichens are highly sensitive components of forest ecosystems, increasingly threatened by habitat disturbance and climate change. While habitat protection remains central to lichen conservation, translocation has emerged as a promising tool to address population decline, although its global effectiveness remains poorly evaluated. This scoping review, conducted under PRISMA-ScR guidelines, analyzes 30 taxa across 12 countries to evaluate current methodologies and outcomes. The reviewed literature is largely characterized by small-scale, method-oriented interventions, with a strong predominance of thallus fragment translocation over diaspore-based approaches. Success is most often evaluated through short-term survival and persistence of transplanted material, whereas indicators of long-term population self-maintenance and reproductive viability are rarely considered. Major limitations emerge from technical constraints, including early sample loss due to inadequate fixation, as well as from mismatches between donor requirements and recipient-site microhabitat conditions. Although high initial survival is frequently reported, evidence for long-term population stability, secondary colonization, and genetic resilience remains scarce. Overall, translocation may support short-term establishment under favorable environmental conditions, mainly at local scales, but its reliability as a long-term conservation strategy requires further validation. This review identifies a critical gap in long-term monitoring and highlights the need for research priorities that enhance the effectiveness, conceptual clarity, and technical precision of future translocation efforts to ensure the persistence of epiphytic lichen populations within changing forest landscapes.

Indexed as

assisted relocationconservation translocationendangered lichensreinforcementreintroduction

Identifiers

PMID41977701
PMCPMC13074778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.