ReviewPolymers2026
Collagen Scaffolds in Regenerative Endodontic Procedures: Current Evidence, Limitations, and Future Perspectives.
Review in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Predictable pulp-dentin regeneration continues to represent a major challenge in regenerative endodontic procedures (REPs). Although collagen-based scaffolds are widely investigated for their excellent biocompatibility, their ability to deliver consistent clinical and histological outcomes requires critical evaluation. This review summarizes recent advances in the application of collagen scaffolds for REPs. Clinical studies demonstrate that these scaffolds support high tooth survival rates and promote vitality recovery, root wall thickening, and apical closure. However, consistent root lengthening remains elusive. Histologically, the newly formed mineralized tissue from collagen scaffolds within REPs tends to be cementum-like or bone-like rather than reparative dentin, a pattern closely associated with the physicochemical properties of collagen, including pore size, porosity, concentration, stiffness, viscosity, and viscoelasticity. We conclude that while collagen scaffolds represent a "promising platform" for REPs due to their biocompatibility and clinical performance, current evidence indicates that they do not consistently achieve true pulp-dentin regeneration. We therefore propose targeted modification and advanced tissue engineering strategies to direct genuine regeneration. This review offers a framework for the rational design of next-generation collagen constructs toward more predictable regenerative outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.