ArticlePolymers2026
Tribomechanical Behaviour and Elasto-Plastic Contact Response of 3D-Printed Versus Conventional Polymer Inserts in Robotic Gripping Interfaces.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Three-dimensional printed polymers produced using Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) exhibit directional microstructures resulting from filament paths, layer interfaces, and cellular infill, leading to mechanical and tribological responses distinct from those of homogeneous bulk materials. This study presents a comparative tribomechanical evaluation of polypropylene (PP) bulk inserts and 3D-printed polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG) inserts with a 30% hexagonal infill, relevant for robotic gripping applications. Progressive scratch tests were performed under loads from 5 to 100 N (150 N for PP), and profilometry was applied to quantify groove morphology, ridge formation, and displaced-volume ratios. An elasto-plastic conical indentation model was used to derive indentation pressures and elastic-plastic transition radii from groove geometry. The PETG inserts exhibited heterogeneous groove depth, intermittent ridge tearing, and friction fluctuations associated with the internal infill structure, consistent with previous findings on anisotropy and architecture-dependent behaviour in additively manufactured polymers. In contrast, bulk PP demonstrated smoother friction profiles and more stable plastic flow under increasing loads. Two functional indices-specific frictional work and ridge-to-trace volumetric ratio-are introduced to support material selection for robotic gripping systems. The results show that local contact mechanics in 3D-printed inserts are governed by print-induced structural features and can be effectively evaluated through a scratch-based elasto-plastic analysis. The methods and results presented in this work support the rational selection and design of polymer inserts for robotic gripper fingertips. The proposed scratch-based elasto-plastic evaluation framework enables manufacturers and automation engineers to compare 3D-printed and conventional materials based on friction stability, wear response, and deformation resistance. This approach can be directly applied to optimise gripping performance in industrial handling, packaging, and collaborative robotics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.