ArticlePolymers2026
Strength and Degradation Characteristics of Zein Biopolymer-Treated Sands Under Wetting-Drying Cycles.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Repeated wetting-drying cycles accelerate scouring and deteriorate soil structure by increasing pore-water pressure. This study examines the durability of sand treated with zein biopolymers subjected to wetting-drying cycles and compares its uncycled condition with that of xanthan gum (XG). The treated specimens are prepared with biopolymer contents of 1% and 3% by mass of sand. The specimens are cured for an initial period of 7 days under atmospheric conditions, whereafter they are subjected to a series of wetting-drying cycles. Subsequently, the dimensions and mass of the specimens are measured to evaluate bulk density-related changes during the cycles. The strength and degradation characteristics of the specimens are evaluated through unconfined compression tests after being subjected to different numbers of cycles. The bulk unit weight after the drying phase remains nearly constant, whereas that after the wetting phase increases with both the number of cycles and biopolymer content. Overall, specimens with higher biopolymer content exhibit lower bulk unit weights. The XG-treated specimens show earlier strength improvement than the zein-treated specimens due to the faster curing-related strength development associated with water-based gelation. Moreover, the XG-treated sand rapidly fails after the first wetting phase, while the compressive strength of the cycled zein-treated specimens is lower than that of the uncycled specimens. Zein-treated sand with 3% biopolymer content shows a higher durability index after 10 cycles than sand treated with 1% biopolymer content. Therefore, a higher zein content can be used to enhance the durability of sand subject to frequent wetting and drying cycles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.