ArticlePolymers2026
Machine Learning-Driven Prediction of Manufacturing Parameters and Analysis of Mechanical Properties of PC-ABS Specimens Produced by the Fused Deposition Modeling Additive Manufacturing Method.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigation of Mechanical and Surface Properties of 3D-Printed Parts Aged Under Different Conditions (Coolant and Xenon Arc).Polymers · 2026Article
- A Heterogeneous Multi-Output Stacked Learning Framework for Mechanical Property Prediction of FDM-Printed ASA: Experimental Validation.Polymers · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the effect of manufacturing parameters on the mechanical properties of PC-ABS samples produced by the Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) additive manufacturing method and to model these relationships using machine learning methods. In the study, the parameters of printing speed, infill density, and raster angle were determined according to the Taguchi L16 experimental design, and tensile, bending, and impact tests were performed on the produced samples. Experimental results showed that the infill density parameter resulted in an increase in tensile strength of approximately 62% (from 25.10 MPa to 40.71 MPa) and an increase in flexural strength of approximately 46% (from 45.13 MPa to 66.13 MPa). Furthermore, an improvement in impact energy of approximately 45% (from 1.698 J to 2.467 J) was achieved under optimum printing speed conditions. Mechanistic properties were predicted using Decision Tree, Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbors, and Multilayer Perceptron models with a dataset generated from experimental data. Comparing the model performances, the Random Forest algorithm was found to provide the highest prediction performance with accuracy in the R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.