Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41977613›Full record

ArticlePolymers2026

Effect of Graphene Oxide on the Acid Resistance of 3D-Printed Provisional Restorations Under Simulated Gastroesophageal Reflux Conditions.

Khanaphan Lebkrut, Atikom Surintanasarn, Tool Sriamporn, Awiruth Klaisiri, Taweesak Boonsod, Supachai Yanarueng, Kanoktip Boonkerd, Niyom Thamrongananskul

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Khanaphan LebkrutDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Atikom SurintanasarnDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Tool SriampornDivision of Prosthodontics, College of Dental Medicine, Rangsit University, Pathumthani 12000, Thailand.
Awiruth KlaisiriDivision of Restorative and Esthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Thammasat University, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-8719-5119
Taweesak BoonsodDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.
Supachai YanaruengFaculty of Public Health and Allied Health Sciences, Praboromarajchanok Institute, Nonthaburi 65000, Thailand.
Kanoktip BoonkerdDepartment of Material Science, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Niyom ThamrongananskulDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.

Funding

The Chulalongkorn University Research Unit in Prosthodontics Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recurrent acidic exposure in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) accelerates the degradation of provisional restorative materials, whereas approaches to enhance the acid resistance of 3D-printed restorations remain inadequately characterized. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of graphene oxide (GO) incorporation on the surface properties and acid resistance of 3D-printed provisional restorative materials under simulated gastroesophageal reflux conditions. GO was synthesized using the Hummers' method and characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and Raman spectroscopy. XRD analysis demonstrated a pronounced shift in the characteristic peak (2θ) from 26° to 12°, consistent with an expansion of interlayer spacing after oxidation. FTIR confirmed the presence of oxygen-containing functional groups (hydroxyl, carbonyl, and epoxy), while Raman spectroscopy identified the characteristic D and G bands, confirming successful GO synthesis. Temporary Crown & Bridge resin (TC100) was modified with GO at six concentrations (0, 0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 wt %) using a planetary ball milling technique. Standardized 3D-printed specimens (n = 24 per group) were fabricated. Surface roughness and Vickers microhardness were measured before and after 45 h of immersion in simulated gastric acid (pH 2). Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and paired

Indexed as

3D-printed provisional restorationsacid resistancegastroesophageal reflux diseasegraphene oxideprovisional dental materialssurface hardnesssurface roughness

Identifiers

PMID41977613
PMCPMC13075129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.