ArticlePolymers2026
The Impact of Coloring Additives on Thermal, Mechanical, and Tribological Properties of FDM-Printed Components.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examines how manufacturer-specific additive formulations used to obtain nominally identical black PLA filaments influence the thermal, mechanical, and tribological performance of FDM-printed parts. Five commercial filaments were analyzed under identical processing conditions using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), tensile testing, pin-on-disc measurements, and stereomicroscopy. The filaments exhibited substantial compositional variability, with total additive contents ranging from 2.08 wt.% to 27.82 wt.%. One filament (M5) contained a significant fraction of inorganic fillers, confirmed by SEM/EDX as Ca-, Na- and Mg-based oxides and silicates, identifying it as a PLA-based composite despite being marketed as standard PLA. These differences strongly affected thermal behavior (Tg, Tcc, Tm) and translated directly into the performance of the printed parts. Ultimate tensile strength varied by 88.91% across all filaments (19.38-36.61 MPa), but only by 13% among the four conventional PLA filaments (M1-M4). Tribological performance differed markedly: mean coefficients of friction ranged from 0.246 (M3) to 0.368 (M2), a spread of approximately 50%, with wear-track morphologies reflecting the frictional response. Overall, the results show that PLA filaments cannot be treated as interchangeable materials. Greater transparency and standardized reporting of filament composition are needed to ensure reproducibility and support informed material selection in FDM applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.