ArticlePolymers2026
Recyclability of Flame-Retardant Polypropylene: Property and Flame Retardancy Assessment.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the framework of plastic circularity, managing end-of-life plastics containing flame-retardant (FR) additives represents a significant challenge. Although FRs are essential for enhancing fire safety in polymeric materials, many FR-containing products are never exposed to fire during their service life. As a result, substantial amounts of still-active FR remain in plastic waste streams. Since mechanical recycling is currently the most widely implemented strategy for plastic waste management, it is crucial to evaluate whether this process affects the flammability and combustion behavior of FR plastics. In this study, polypropylene (PP) containing 21 wt.% intumescent FR (IFR) was reprocessed up to five times to simulate mechanical recycling. After each cycle, the materials were systematically characterized in terms of rheological, morphological, combustion, and mechanical behavior. Although the agglomeration of IFR particles was observed after multiple cycles, the materials maintained stable processability and thermal stability. Importantly, the charring efficiency of the IFR system was preserved, resulting in consistent flammability performance; furthermore, all reprocessed samples achieved UL 94 V-0 classification and exhibited comparable limited oxygen index values. Mechanical properties were likewise largely maintained. Overall, these findings demonstrate that mechanical recycling represents a viable end-of-life strategy for this PP/IFR system, supporting its compatibility with circular material flow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.