ArticlePolymers2026
Hollow Auxetic Polymer Structures with Manufacturing-Constrained Design and Mechanical Validation.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hollow auxetic structures enable lightweight mechanical design by reducing mass while preserving architected deformation. However, hollow auxetic studies focus on LPBF metals. This study presents a manufacturing-constrained design and validation framework for a hollow hybrid re-entrant chiral lattice produced by stereolithography. The unit cell was parameterised by chiral angle, re-entrant strut length, and hollow internal diameter, with drainage features integrated into the CAD model to preserve hollow channels during printing and post-processing. A minimum internal diameter study defined the printable design window. Within these limits, a central composite design coupled with finite element analysis mapped the response surface and identified an optimised geometry of θ = 15°, L = 3.5 mm, and d = 1.68 mm, with a predicted unit-cell negative Poisson's ratio of about -1.17. Compression testing confirmed that the printed unit cell and 3 × 3 × 3 lattice retained the intended rotation-dominated auxetic deformation mode. At the selected comparison strain, the unit cell showed a negative Poisson's ratio of -0.68 and the 3 × 3 × 3 lattice showed -0.29. Relative to the solid lattice, the hollow lattice reduced density by 42.4% with only a 3.0% reduction in stiffness, increasing specific stiffness by 68.9% and specific peak strength by 5.2%, but reducing specific energy absorption by 25.6% due to earlier localisation and junction driven fracture. These results provide practical design guidance for manufacturable hollow SLA auxetic lattices, especially for lightweight and stiffness-limited applications where low mass and high specific stiffness are more important than energy absorption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.