ArticlePolymers2026
Comparative Experimental Assessment of Elastomeric and Thermoplastic Sealing Materials in Valve Sealing Under Cyclic High-Pressure Hydrogen Exposure.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hydrogen is increasingly adopted as a clean energy carrier for storing and transporting low-carbon energy. Achieving a practical volumetric energy density for real-world deployment typically requires compression to several hundred bar, which in turn demands dedicated high-pressure infrastructure. Because valves are indispensable for isolation and flow control within this infrastructure, durable sealing valve materials become a key reliability and safety requirement. This assembly-level screening study compares two valve configurations with different polymer assemblies: EPDM O-rings with PEEK seats/bushing and NBR O-rings with POM seats/bushing. Four new identical 500-bar ball valves were tested (two EPDM/PEEK and two NBR/POM). For each seal configuration, one valve was cycled 5000 times at 500 bar in helium (inert baseline), and a second identical valve was cycled 5000 times at 500 bar in hydrogen to isolate hydrogen effects from mechanical/metallic wear. Leakage was tracked during cycling, and seals were analyzed by SEM/EDX after testing. The EPDM/PEEK configuration remained leak-tight in both gases, with no cracking observed in the elastomer or thermoplastic components. The NBR/POM configuration exhibited POM bushing fracture during cycling and minor external leakage at the stem during the hydrogen phase, accompanied by micro-fissures on the NBR O-ring surface. EDX indicated composition changes after cycling, including oxygen and fluorine enrichment and occasional metallic transfer species, consistent with surface films and deposits. Under the present valve geometry and cycling protocol, EPDM/PEEK provided robust sealing, whereas NBR/POM showed failure modes relevant to high-pressure service. These findings are intended as configuration-level screening evidence to be used in valves rather than as a full qualification of the individual materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.