ArticlePolymers2026
Manufacturing-Induced Defect Taxonomy and Visual Detection in UD Tapes with Carbon and Glass Fiber Reinforcements.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Continuous unidirectional (UD) thermoplastic composite tapes are increasingly used in aerospace, automotive, and energy applications because of their high specific strength, low weight, recyclability, and compatibility with automated manufacturing. Since final component performance strongly depends on tape quality, reliable defect characterization and detection are essential. In this study, manufacturing-induced defects in polypropylene-based UD tapes reinforced with carbon and glass fibers were investigated using real images acquired directly from laboratory-scale production without synthetic data. Defects related to interfacial integrity, matrix distribution, fiber architecture, and surface irregularities were systematically analyzed, and a practical four-class defect taxonomy was established. To enable automated inspection under limited-data conditions, lightweight YOLOv8, YOLOv11, and the new YOLO26 models were comparatively evaluated using a UD tape-specific augmentation strategy combining physically constrained Albumentations and on-the-fly augmentation. Among the tested models, YOLO26-s achieved the best overall performance, reaching a mean mAP@0.5 of 0.87 ± 0.03, outperforming YOLOv11 (0.83) and YOLOv8 (0.78), with 0.90 precision and 0.85 recall. Interfacial (0.92 mAP) and matrix-related (0.90 mAP) defects were detected most reliably, whereas fiber-related (0.89 mAP) and surface defects (0.79 mAP) remained more challenging, particularly in glass-fiber-reinforced tapes due to transparency-masking effects. The results demonstrate the potential of compact deep learning models for computationally efficient and manufacturing-relevant in-line quality monitoring of UD tape production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.