ArticlePolymers2026
Investigation of Polymer Adhesion of Materials in Multimaterial FFF Process.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A review on radiological properties of fused deposition modelling material for three-dimensional printing in proton and light ion beam therapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing availability of multi-material fused filament fabrication (FFF) systems has intensified the need for a systematic understanding of interfacial adhesion between model and support polymers. In this study, the adhesion behavior of commonly used engineering thermoplastics and dedicated support materials was investigated in the context of multimaterial FFF. A comprehensive experimental methodology was developed, including a custom tensile test specimen and fixture specifically designed to quantify interfacial adhesion under controlled conditions. Material combinations based on ABS, ASA, PETG, and carbon-fiber-reinforced PA (PAHT-CF), together with manufacturer-recommended and alternative support materials, were evaluated using uniaxial tensile testing and fracture surface analysis. The results demonstrate that interfacial adhesion strongly depends on material compatibility and processing conditions, and that dedicated support materials generally provide lower adhesion than model-model combinations. However, significant deviations were observed: SUPP PA exhibited unexpectedly high adhesion when paired with PAHT-CF, while SUPP ABS proved to be a more versatile support across multiple model materials, offering a favorable balance between sufficient adhesion during printing and ease of removal. Several material pairs showed negligible adhesion, leading to separation during manufacturing and limiting their practical applicability. Microscopic analysis revealed the coexistence of diffusion-driven bonding, mechanical interlocking, and weak boundary layer effects. The findings highlight that optimal support performance requires neither minimal nor excessive adhesion, and provide experimentally validated guidance for selecting material combinations and process windows in multimaterial FFF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.