ArticlePolymers2026
Ammonium Bisulfite and Urea-Metabisulfite as Formaldehyde Scavengers in Low-Molar-Ratio Urea-Formaldehyde Resin for Medium-Density Fiberboard: Curing Behavior and Panel Performance.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances in Wood and Wood Polymer Composites.Polymers · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ultra-low-formaldehyde medium-density fiberboard (MDF) is commonly produced using low-molar-ratio urea-formaldehyde (UF) resins; however, the reduced formaldehyde-to-urea ratio also lowers resin reactivity and can complicate curing. The aim of this research work was to investigate and evaluate the performance of ammonium bisulfite and urea-metabisulfite as formaldehyde scavengers for a low-molar-ratio UF resin (F/U = 1.06) at 1, 3, and 5 wt% (based on dry UF resin solids) used for MDF panel manufacturing. The modified adhesive systems were first screened by simultaneous thermal analysis in air to determine changes in the curing profile, and laboratory panels were then produced and evaluated for formaldehyde content by the perforator method (EN ISO 12460-5:2015) and for the main physical and mechanical properties. Ammonium bisulfite shifted the main curing peak to higher temperatures, indicating stronger retardation of the principal polycondensation stage, whereas urea-metabisulfite generated a broader, multi-peak curing profile. Despite these differences, both additives reduced the perforator values substantially. The control MDF already met the E0 level (3.84 mg/100 g oven-dry board), while 3 wt% ammonium bisulfite and 5 wt% urea-metabisulfite reached the super E0 levels (<1.5 mg/100 g; 1.36 and 1.26 mg/100 g, respectively). To note, scavenger addition up to 5 wt% (based on dry UF resin solids) did not significantly affect density, water absorption/thickness swelling, or bending and internal bond properties. The results demonstrate that sulfite-based scavengers can be incorporated into low-molar-ratio UF adhesives to obtain ultra-low-formaldehyde MDF while maintaining the main panel properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.