ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Evaluation of the Biological Standardization of Native Der p 1, Der p 2 and Der p 23 Proteins Isolated from Natural Allergen Source.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
House dust mite allergens Der p 1, Der p 2, and Der p 23 are recognized as major clinically relevant allergens worldwide; however, it is difficult to obtain these proteins in purified form from a natural source, which limits their use in molecular targeted immunotherapy and in vivo diagnosis. In this study, we developed and validated robust methodologies for the large-scale purification and individual characterization of native nDer p 1, nDer p 2, and nDer p 23 allergens from the natural sensitization source,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.