ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
A Comparative Review of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Small Molecule Versus Peptide Drug Discovery.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional drug discovery processes are typically expensive, time-consuming, and have a very high failure rate. Artificial intelligence (AI) is currently reshaping this field in unprecedented ways, promising to significantly improve the efficiency and success rate of drug development. This article systematically compares and analyzes the application of AI for two major drug types: small molecule vs. peptide drugs. It explores their applications in several key stages of drug development, including virtual screening, lead compound optimization, de novo drug design, ADMET (absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity) property prediction, and chemical synthesis planning. While both drug types benefit from AI-driven approaches, fundamental differences exist in molecular representation, data availability, key challenges, and model adaptability. For small molecule drugs, AI focuses on drug efficacy, synthetic feasibility, and accurate structure-activity relationship prediction. In contrast, for peptide drugs, AI faces more unique biological challenges, such as inherent flexibility, complex biological functions, stability, and immunogenicity. Finally, this article provides a forward-looking perspective on the future of AI-driven drug discovery, highlighting the immense potential of basic models, multimodal integrated systems, and autonomous discovery platforms, which will collectively drive the next wave of precision drug development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.