Functional Characterization of

Binita Adhikari, Donna M Gordon, Jeanmarie Verchot

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Binita AdhikariDepartment of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77845, USA.

Donna M GordonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA.

Jeanmarie VerchotDepartment of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77845, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8789-3144

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Yeast models are widely used to study molecular chaperones from diverse organisms, including plants, because of their well-characterized genetics and the conservation of the protein-folding machinery among eukaryotes. Cross-species complementation studies in yeast have yielded valuable insights into conserved biochemical activity and molecular functions that manage protein folding, assembly, and repair during stress. This study evaluated the functional capacity of three potato

Indexed as

HSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsPlant ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSolanum tuberosumEndoplasmic ReticulumEndoplasmic Reticulum StressFungal ProteinsGene DeletionGenetic Complementation TestMolecular ChaperonesOxidative StressProtein IsoformsUnfolded Protein ResponseFungal ProteinsHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsKAR2 protein, yeastMolecular ChaperonesPlant ProteinsProtein IsoformsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsBiPendoplasmic reticulumheterologous expressionKar2membrane proteinsmolecular chaperonesprotein foldingSaccharomyces cerevisiaeunfolded protein response

Identifiers

PMID41977279

DOI10.3390/ijms27073094

PMCPMC13072888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.